[Sportsnet 590] “Chad Green would be a pretty attractive guy to a contender who thinks they’re going to stay a contender.” @KeeganMatheson forecasts what the #BlueJays’ plans might be with the reliever before the trade deadline.


[Sportsnet 590] “Chad Green would be a pretty attractive guy to a contender who thinks they’re going to stay a contender.” @KeeganMatheson forecasts what the #BlueJays’ plans might be with the reliever before the trade deadline.

3 comments
  1. You put the guys with 1 Y remaining out there and if a team steps up with a big offer the great you take it but otherwise you prioritize the rentals first.

    Keegan seemed to imply the Jays won’t get Top 30 guys for any of the rentals…which is like fucking absurd…LOL.

  2. Sure if a team is willing to make a massive overpay you are open to it, especially with bullpen arms. But we don’t *NEED* to do it

  3. I can get behind trading Green, but like the other valuable 2 year players it’s “blow me away”.

    Jays have shown a good ability of picking up bullpen arms (despite this year’s disaster) and there is a massive roster crunch next year with the lack of options and rule 5 protections next year.

    Based on Romano’s diagnosis we haven’t lost him for 2025 yet and finding the back half of the bullpen is easier than a closer

Leave a Reply