Michkov and Demidov are going to be compared for their entire careers, aren’t they…
Reinbacher top 15?
This list is legit!!!
Hutson not in top 20?
This list is a joke.
Sens with 1 player in the top 100, rebuild complete!
I feel like Nikishin is criminally low on that list.
It’s not just having more than double the average number of quality prospects it’s also having a bunch of young talent already in the NHL. Looks good!
This one’s been removed at the request of DSL — in the future please refrain from posting a screenshot of the entire list as it takes away from the author’s ability to get webtraffic for their articles. Thanks for sharing and feel free to resubmit it without the screenshot
people are sleeping on Mailloux
“You don’t trot out Celine Dion to announce that you’re picking Carter Yakemchuk” – Jack Todd
Nice to see Reinbacher so high but I feel like Mailloux should be more towards the middle. Otherwise a pretty good list IMO.
I think our prospects are ranked decently, except for Mailloux. He should be around 50. I don’t mind seeing Hutson this “low”. He’s ranked around some very good prospects, and it’s still unclear the kind of role he will have at the NHL level.
I know Chicago got Bedard, but I think San Jose’s rebuild is already ahead of theirs. Sharks have some very nice pieces to build around.
I don’t think I woulda had Stankoven below Reinbacher.
I think everyone is ranked great. I think Hutson can be higher but I like the prospects ranked above him
Demidov and Hutson are great prospects to have.
What possibly justifies ranking Simashev above Reinbacher?
I prefer tier ranking over number by number ranking because it’s impossible to make these rankings make sense.
Like how can Yurov end up # 46 with so many lesser players in front of him makes no sense but if it’s splitted into tiers then it can work imo.
The gap between Hage and Greentree isweird as fuck. During the draft I had one or the other in mind at #21, idk why Hage is that far back.
7 players out of a 100, whereas every team should have an average of 3.1. So we have twice the avg. pretty pretty good.
I guess I just don’t understand how they made this because how can Mailloux be under Hage and Beck.
He’s an AHL allstar, and the other two haven’t even played a pro game yet, even if it’s projection it’s very generous…
Also Tij over Smith feels off…
Hutson after Reinbacher really highlights how garbage this list is.
23 comments
Habs prospects on the list:
3. Demidov
13. Reinbacher
27. Hutson
52. Roy
72. Hage
76. Beck
95. Mailloux
Full article here (paywall): [https://eprinkside.com/2024/08/16/ranking-the-nhls-top-100-affiliated-prospects-ahead-of-the-2024-25-season](https://eprinkside.com/2024/08/16/ranking-the-nhls-top-100-affiliated-prospects-ahead-of-the-2024-25-season)
Michkov and Demidov are going to be compared for their entire careers, aren’t they…
Reinbacher top 15?
This list is legit!!!
Hutson not in top 20?
This list is a joke.
Sens with 1 player in the top 100, rebuild complete!
I feel like Nikishin is criminally low on that list.
It’s not just having more than double the average number of quality prospects it’s also having a bunch of young talent already in the NHL. Looks good!
This one’s been removed at the request of DSL — in the future please refrain from posting a screenshot of the entire list as it takes away from the author’s ability to get webtraffic for their articles. Thanks for sharing and feel free to resubmit it without the screenshot
people are sleeping on Mailloux
“You don’t trot out Celine Dion to announce that you’re picking Carter Yakemchuk” – Jack Todd
Nice to see Reinbacher so high but I feel like Mailloux should be more towards the middle. Otherwise a pretty good list IMO.
I think our prospects are ranked decently, except for Mailloux. He should be around 50. I don’t mind seeing Hutson this “low”. He’s ranked around some very good prospects, and it’s still unclear the kind of role he will have at the NHL level.
I know Chicago got Bedard, but I think San Jose’s rebuild is already ahead of theirs. Sharks have some very nice pieces to build around.
I don’t think I woulda had Stankoven below Reinbacher.
I think everyone is ranked great. I think Hutson can be higher but I like the prospects ranked above him
Demidov and Hutson are great prospects to have.
What possibly justifies ranking Simashev above Reinbacher?
I prefer tier ranking over number by number ranking because it’s impossible to make these rankings make sense.
Like how can Yurov end up # 46 with so many lesser players in front of him makes no sense but if it’s splitted into tiers then it can work imo.
The gap between Hage and Greentree isweird as fuck. During the draft I had one or the other in mind at #21, idk why Hage is that far back.
7 players out of a 100, whereas every team should have an average of 3.1. So we have twice the avg. pretty pretty good.
I guess I just don’t understand how they made this because how can Mailloux be under Hage and Beck.
He’s an AHL allstar, and the other two haven’t even played a pro game yet, even if it’s projection it’s very generous…
Also Tij over Smith feels off…
Hutson after Reinbacher really highlights how garbage this list is.
*stacked*