[NFLPA] Statement on behalf of our Executive Committee regarding the locker room media policy.


[NFLPA] Statement on behalf of our Executive Committee regarding the locker room media policy.

14 comments
  1. That second guy seems full of it I don’t understand how the location of an interview can “fortify the relationship”

    The players should just refuse to interview in the Locker room

    Also how does it work with a women reporter? Do they go into the locker room?

  2. I don’t see why they can’t have a separate room to talk to 10-15 players after the game and they have had time to shower change etc cause it’s not like 99.99% of the time anyone is asking for the 3rd string center to answer questions after a game

  3. I’ll never forget the day that Chris long got caught lacking cause of a locker room interview. Suprised they weren’t banned after that

  4. As long as we get a recording of a “But not today!”-style speech **every once in a while**, I’m okay with limiting access.

  5. Lmao, fortifying relationships?! Media has and will always be the biggest wannabe dickriders in history.

    How the nfl let this last this long without a lawsuit is crazy.

    You aint on the team and never will be, go wait outside like the rest of us plebs

  6. Torrey is wild for that but this should be an easy deal. It also gives players the opportunity to calm down after tough losses and not say something that gets them jammed up

  7. I just want that ‘Bufford’ content.

    Not another reporter asking the same softball question that everyone else is asking.

  8. Maybe have a reporter of the month based on clicks, and they get unlimited access for the whole month, shower room, and bathroom stalls included.

  9. Just get rid of post game interviews all together. All it is is 95% bullshit and 5% over reactionary shit to things that couldn’t possibly be properly processed directly after a game.

Leave a Reply