No words

10 comments
  1. So many people in here being quiet right now about who they took. I mean, Boston -16.5 without Trae and Zeller, that’s the lock of the century!

  2. Fun fact — we were like 13.5 years ago during the Covid years v the sixers at the sixers and we won bc bogi spazzed down the 4th

  3. I always had a feeling that with, or without Trae, this team would be capable of a result like that.
    It’s young and skilled. We’re in a similar place to where Oklahoma were 2 seasons back, when Gilgeous, Dort, and Giddey were finding their feet. They were just one Holmgren away from becoming a force.

    But our big, longstanding problem, is consistency. For me, I won’t be convinced by this team, until it starts winning it’s b2bs. Not sure if there are any statisticians out there, but apart from the post All Star Nate run of legend, what’s our b2b game win rate in the Trae era?

    Will be shocked if it’s over 30%

    I think that’s on coaching. Let’s be honest, while we don’t want Trae going anywhere, he needs to be more willing to sit on the bench…

    Anyway, f Boston. 😀

Leave a Reply