Steph said it’s not about the quality, it’s about the quantity

26 comments
  1. the F is funny because a lot of his shots would be low quality if he wasn’t Steph fucking Curry

  2. The fact that the shot quality is an F and everything else in an A just proves: 🐐🐐🐐

  3. So,Ed of these ‘stats’ are weird – we’re rating ‘talent’ with a value now? How do you determine gravity? He certainly has it, but what is the metric?

  4. F because defenses still have to adjust to him more than any other player… and it still doesn’t work.

  5. Shot Quality F might not be the worst if Kevon Looney is there getting all the offensive rebounds..

  6. Who in the league is out there taking worse shots than Steph? How is that person in the league?

  7. i remember a post in 2020/21 about how steph had the worst spacing in the league available to him

  8. Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but 17% of players are shooting better than 43% from 3? Seems unlikely, but maybe that’s just the talent level of today’s NBA.

  9. ![gif](giphy|EiB7h5KhHSiPEIA29c|downsized)

    Guys, the grade makes sense! He gets there an F. F for “Fire”, which I suppose really means A!

  10. I’d rather have Steph take a dribble pull up 3 while triple teamed than 90% of the NBA taking an open corner 3

  11. Insane how good he still is at age 36. Some other great point guards as reference at that age:

    Deron Williams: out of the league at 32
    Allen Iverson;: out of the league at 34
    Nash: 15/11
    Westbrook: currently averaging 11/5
    Chauncey Billups: 8/3
    Tony Parker: 9/3

  12. Actually cause he take so many bad quality shots his gravity becomes astronomical cause you just never know when he’ll launch which is actually what we’ve seen in the crazy coverages

    If however he did take better shots maybe he’d hit 50-60%!! Or my better thought is that he sucks at wide open 3s and rather take bad ones 😁😁

Leave a Reply