Text

13 comments

  1. It will be an interesting debate at the end of their careers. Giannis has a longer peak. And he will likely lead in a lot of counting stats by a wide margin.

    I think Jokic will be seen as one of those guys who changed the game and inspired a new type of Center; whereas Giannis was so unique we won’t see anyone else like him.

  3. I like David Aldridge and John Hollinger, but this is just another meaningless list that we should know to ignore by now that’s attempting the impossible task of comparing players across eras…and also I’m a hypocrite because I care enough to say that both of them should be higher.

  4. Giannis has a better and more complete overall resume and when people stop obsessing over advanced stats they can’t explain it isn’t that surprising.

  5. I’m just glad they didn’t put Kobe in the top 3.

    Dude died in a helicopter crash and suddenly he went into GOAT conversations

  6. I’m sorry but can we stop worrying about where Giannis on any active player are on the all time list before their careers are over? You really getting upset because some asshole with a keyboard doesn’t appreciate your favorite player as much as you think he should? Either unsubscribe from the bullshit or read it chuckle and move on. So much of this sub and bucks twitter is just bitching about crap national writers

  7. I actually saw most people still had Giannis higher all time until Jokic won his 3rd MVP last year. Either way they’re in very similar spots legacy wise right now and more success from either one will put them into the top 12 range

  9. It’s interesting how much Kobe jumped on these lists after he died. Did anyone even have him in their top 20 when he was still alive?

  10. Does someone have a take on how the Detroit win over Indiana affects us for NBA Cup? I knew to root for Indy, but that certainly didn’t happen.

  11. Defense gets so overlooked Giannis provides so much value on the end of the ball.

    Regardless they’re both insanely good.

Leave a Reply