Packers may ironically succeed in getting butt-packing at the line of scrimmage outlawed.

11 comments
  1. as always FTP. frankly don’t have a problem with the tush push, and as we’ve seen time and time again with other teams attempting it — if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. get good and attempt your own

  2. I’m kind of somewhere in between. I wouldn’t say I love the play by any means, but also, don’t feel there is a need to get rid of it.

  3. Has support is vastly different than has a majority of support when it comes to actually getting banned.

  4. Bears don’t need the tush push because we can just hand the ball off to Doug Kramer in short yardage situations.

  5. Banning a play because one team has the talent to execute it properly is weak shit. Heres a hint, maybe dont allow the Eagles to get within 1-2 yards of the endzone.

    If you cant even do that, youre probably going to lose anyway.

  6. If this ban goes through, I’m gonna miss seeing 300 lb bodies clashing against each other right at the line of scrimmage with the sound of the helmets hitting and all that. It’s a sight to behold.

  7. Is this cuz all the red state guys get confused when they see it? Like, they’re not sure why they want it to happen to *them* so bad?

  8. I don’t even like the tush push, I think it’s ugly and bad football, but banning it is so reactionary. Every team has tried it and failed compared to the eagles.

  9. It was against the rules up until 2005, it’s not like it’s some historical rule that has always been a thing. There’s a reason it was not allowed the first 80 years of the NFL and we’re just figuring that out again.

Leave a Reply