This isn’t including the Jerel Worthy, Nick Perry, Datone Jones etc drafts.
29 comments
Obviously the chiefs are first if it includes sb wins. What a pointless stat to include
This is what happens when a betting site tries to do actual data analysis. They include ‘Super Bowl Champions’ lmao.
There’s a lot of things to point to for improvement, this nonsense ain’t it.
This is honestly stupid. TJ Watt alone has more awards, all pros and pro bowls and has won zero playoff games in his career and the packers have won 6 and made the playoffs in 7 of those season.
Maybe we haven’t hit on absolute stars but sill have drafted very solid players which makes the overall team better.
I’m not sure why Super Bowl champion players should be counted. Of course that skews the study toward the Chiefs.
This sub is just a shitty packers fan Facebook page at this point
SI did a team ranking recently by drafting the last 10 years and included actual analysis of things like how long players stay on their teams, second contracts, etc. The Packers were like 10 or 12 in that
SB wins but not playoff wins? Over the last 30 years we have the second most wins after the patriots and its largely because we have been disciplined with our thresholds for drafting certain types at every position. Basically every other team would kill to have the consistency we have had for that long
This criteria is horrendously bad. According to this formula, Mac Jones was a better pick than Jordan Love
Now count the number of wins over that same period. Guarantee the Packers are in the top 5.
Damn they must’ve been pretty bad these last 10 years then
I think it honestly states how they under rate our team.
The Browns have perennial All Pro Myles Garrett and have one playoff victory in 30 years.
“Betway studied…”
I’m out dawg.
What a dogshit post and study. Superbowl wins? A betting site trying to do analysis? Lmao.
Hard to think of a stupider way to evaluate drafts. Chiefs have had a number of misses in the draft and get more points for them than the Packers get for great draft choices like Elgton Jenkins and Zach Tom.
Pro Bowl awards have lost almost all their actual meaning. Any stats or points that consider those values should be thrown out.
Yeah I don’t really care what cherry picked stats a gambling website is using.
If drafting is about find stars than ya. But we’re on if the best teams in the nfl at drafting because we find quality starters all over the draft. We get and develop value.
If you only scored points with home runs this would make sense, but you can score without going yard.
Chiefs had mahommes. One player can change that whole list. Packers are 32 and the bears are 28th have the bears drafted well in the last 10 year no. There aren’t many bears fans that wouldn’t trade their drafts for ours.
Also this list doesn’t show value of guys like Zack Tom Aaron jones that are top 10 or top 5 in their positions each year but don’t get recognition. They aren’t busts they are home run picks.
Does it factor in that teams like the packers pick towards the end of the first more often? I can’t even remember the last time we had a top 10 draft pick… was it Raji?
So I this tells me that I have better chance to win the Super Bowl if I have players that won the Super Bowl.
Surely having a generational player win multiple MVPs at quarterback drafted before the period they are analyzing contributes nothing to this being the result.
I mean, I’m more critical of our recent drafts than most but even I wouldn’t venture to say they’ve been the worst in the NFL
What about the jets and browns? The criteria for the info is likely extremely flawed
So, the Packers drafted worse than the Panthers, the Jaguars the Jets, and the Giants?
This might be the dumbest ranking I’ve ever seen. Not saying our drafts are amazing, but look at the criteria. Seriously?
So what does it actually mean??? We’ve been consistently one of the better teams in those 10 years???
The Chiefs have 53 Super Bowl champs on their roster how are people supposed to compete with that level of talent!
That list is obviously skewed by super bowl winners. Still though, the drafting has not been awesome.
29 comments
Obviously the chiefs are first if it includes sb wins. What a pointless stat to include
This is what happens when a betting site tries to do actual data analysis. They include ‘Super Bowl Champions’ lmao.
There’s a lot of things to point to for improvement, this nonsense ain’t it.
This is honestly stupid. TJ Watt alone has more awards, all pros and pro bowls and has won zero playoff games in his career and the packers have won 6 and made the playoffs in 7 of those season.
Maybe we haven’t hit on absolute stars but sill have drafted very solid players which makes the overall team better.
I’m not sure why Super Bowl champion players should be counted. Of course that skews the study toward the Chiefs.
This sub is just a shitty packers fan Facebook page at this point
SI did a team ranking recently by drafting the last 10 years and included actual analysis of things like how long players stay on their teams, second contracts, etc. The Packers were like 10 or 12 in that
SB wins but not playoff wins? Over the last 30 years we have the second most wins after the patriots and its largely because we have been disciplined with our thresholds for drafting certain types at every position. Basically every other team would kill to have the consistency we have had for that long
This criteria is horrendously bad. According to this formula, Mac Jones was a better pick than Jordan Love
Now count the number of wins over that same period. Guarantee the Packers are in the top 5.
Damn they must’ve been pretty bad these last 10 years then
I think it honestly states how they under rate our team.
The Browns have perennial All Pro Myles Garrett and have one playoff victory in 30 years.
“Betway studied…”
I’m out dawg.
What a dogshit post and study. Superbowl wins? A betting site trying to do analysis? Lmao.
Hard to think of a stupider way to evaluate drafts. Chiefs have had a number of misses in the draft and get more points for them than the Packers get for great draft choices like Elgton Jenkins and Zach Tom.
Pro Bowl awards have lost almost all their actual meaning. Any stats or points that consider those values should be thrown out.
Yeah I don’t really care what cherry picked stats a gambling website is using.
If drafting is about find stars than ya. But we’re on if the best teams in the nfl at drafting because we find quality starters all over the draft. We get and develop value.
If you only scored points with home runs this would make sense, but you can score without going yard.
Chiefs had mahommes. One player can change that whole list. Packers are 32 and the bears are 28th have the bears drafted well in the last 10 year no. There aren’t many bears fans that wouldn’t trade their drafts for ours.
Also this list doesn’t show value of guys like Zack Tom Aaron jones that are top 10 or top 5 in their positions each year but don’t get recognition. They aren’t busts they are home run picks.
Does it factor in that teams like the packers pick towards the end of the first more often? I can’t even remember the last time we had a top 10 draft pick… was it Raji?
So I this tells me that I have better chance to win the Super Bowl if I have players that won the Super Bowl.
Surely having a generational player win multiple MVPs at quarterback drafted before the period they are analyzing contributes nothing to this being the result.
I mean, I’m more critical of our recent drafts than most but even I wouldn’t venture to say they’ve been the worst in the NFL
What about the jets and browns? The criteria for the info is likely extremely flawed
So, the Packers drafted worse than the Panthers, the Jaguars the Jets, and the Giants?
This might be the dumbest ranking I’ve ever seen. Not saying our drafts are amazing, but look at the criteria. Seriously?
So what does it actually mean??? We’ve been consistently one of the better teams in those 10 years???
The Chiefs have 53 Super Bowl champs on their roster how are people supposed to compete with that level of talent!
That list is obviously skewed by super bowl winners. Still though, the drafting has not been awesome.