So i found this article online and it reminded me of the one i read yesterday that was about an MPJ trade to the Rockets (cant remember for which players though).
Look i know MPJ is our most tradeable guy, but i dont like the idea of trading him.
Maybe things will change by the trade deadline, but rn it feels premature to trade anyone.
This one is still kinda decent compared to trading MPJ for Lavine. Lavine would be great, but not at the cost of MPJ. I dont think people realise what a big deal it is having MPJ for his size.
Yes he cant create his own shot, but that rebounding and shooting is way too good and i think people really underestimate how much other teams would want a guy like that.
They always talk about his contract like he isnt one of the most unique players in the league.
8 comments
I don’t think we should trade any of our starters. No sense in breaking up the chemistry. I don’t understand the Mike hate. He gets better every year, and he’s averaging the same as Jamal rn.
“aesthetically pleasing Nuggets shooter”
Sexy markets always think they can get the better deal in each and every trade. Because they usually do. But MPJ looks more and more valuable to me all the time as a player. He is tradable because his contract only has 2 more years on it. But Denver gets much worse as a team in this proposal and there’s no freaking way.
Next up: Nuggets considering Jokić-for-Dray-and-picks, who says no?
How in the fuck is that an even remotely fair trade?
Lavine sucks, he’s actually the only-cares-about-stats, doesn’t-try-on-defense guy that people say MPJ is. He had one good year and has been shit before and since. Plus this team doesn’t need another guard.
More fan fiction. This isn’t an article.
My mother is on so many antidepressants it’s hard to know what she thinks
Also no
I mean these are always just random sports writers cooking up ideas for their articles, it’s not like they quote any actual sources or anything to suggest this is actually being considered