Statements from the officials and Huska regarding the OT loss
December 6, 2024
Honestly I don't think they should have counted it as incidental? You could obviously see a flex on the stick that pushed Vladars pad in the net.. oh well. Onto the next one!
9 comments
The ghost of Dennis Wideman strikes yet again
Incidental contact is bumping his pad or elbow, not pushing his leg into the net
Guess they’re going to ignore the following paragraph. Cherry picking at its finest.
After a quick Google search. Parayko uses a 112 flex stick. His stick fucking flexed when it pushed dans pad. That was not incidental contact lol
I can’t wait for this exact play to be called in the opposite against us.
Flames Hockey^(tm)
Cowardly refs. Cowardly command centre. Don’t have the stones to make the correct call. The only person who was right was Kelly Hrudey.
I am going to be unpopular for saying this but In my opinion its a goal. To dissallow it would be a crazy precedent. Its close but Parayako clearly made a play on the puck. He pushes the puck which is loose and that is fair play. The league cant start dissalowing goals because players are rebounding the puck and their stick touches the goalie
I am done with this stupid play reviews. They hurt more the game than anything. The worst are the Goalie interference and off side. Those can be factors or not bet get reversed either way. I.e. when the offside creates an advantage position of the O player and scores, it’s ok to reverse the goal, but there is an offside and the puck gets passed multiple times and then a few Doritos later they score. The offside was completely irrelevant. This goal should stand and this situation is the majority of the reversals. Just like the Carbon tax, axe the play reviews in general and let’s live with the result of the bad calls.
Next time a scrum occurs in the crease just shove the goalie into the net and say incidental contact
9 comments
The ghost of Dennis Wideman strikes yet again
Incidental contact is bumping his pad or elbow, not pushing his leg into the net
Guess they’re going to ignore the following paragraph. Cherry picking at its finest.
After a quick Google search. Parayko uses a 112 flex stick. His stick fucking flexed when it pushed dans pad. That was not incidental contact lol
I can’t wait for this exact play to be called in the opposite against us.
Flames Hockey^(tm)
Cowardly refs. Cowardly command centre. Don’t have the stones to make the correct call. The only person who was right was Kelly Hrudey.
I am going to be unpopular for saying this but In my opinion its a goal. To dissallow it would be a crazy precedent. Its close but Parayako clearly made a play on the puck. He pushes the puck which is loose and that is fair play. The league cant start dissalowing goals because players are rebounding the puck and their stick touches the goalie
I am done with this stupid play reviews. They hurt more the game than anything. The worst are the Goalie interference and off side. Those can be factors or not bet get reversed either way. I.e. when the offside creates an advantage position of the O player and scores, it’s ok to reverse the goal, but there is an offside and the puck gets passed multiple times and then a few Doritos later they score. The offside was completely irrelevant. This goal should stand and this situation is the majority of the reversals. Just like the Carbon tax, axe the play reviews in general and let’s live with the result of the bad calls.
Next time a scrum occurs in the crease just shove the goalie into the net and say incidental contact